DDTN vs. SFLR
DDTN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
DDTN vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTN achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.29% return.
DDTN
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 4.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 14.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTN vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November | 5.22% | 0.84% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 3.29% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTN and SFLR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTN vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
DDTN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SFLR
DDTN vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November (DDTN) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTN | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTN vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTN drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTN and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTN | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -12.13% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -2.74% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -1.75% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility
DDTN vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTN | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.82% | 9.69% | -1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 10.32% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 10.32% | -2.50% |
DDTN vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTN vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
DDTN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDTN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTN and SFLR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDTN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for DDTN.
DDTN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTN and 0.89% for SFLR.
Find the right allocation for DDTN and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer