DDTL vs. PTNQ
DDTL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by Innovator, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDTL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.
Performance
DDTL vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTL achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly lower than PTNQ's 9.62% return.
DDTL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 16.40%
DDTL vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 4.69% | 4.70% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 9.62% | 11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTL and PTNQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTL vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
DDTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PTNQ
DDTL vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTL | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTL vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTL drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTL and PTNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTL | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -28.07% | +24.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -4.12% | +4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -5.68% | +5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility
DDTL vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTL | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 17.37% | -11.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 13.39% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 16.51% | -10.88% |
DDTL vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTL vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.80% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTL and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PTNQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PTNQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.
PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.
DDTL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTL and 0.65% for PTNQ.
Find the right allocation for DDTL and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer