PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTL vs. PTNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTL vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTL achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than PTNQ's 8.20% return.


DDTL

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.66%
6M
5.00%
YTD
5.40%
1Y
11.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PTNQ

1D
-1.66%
1M
-3.35%
6M
6.95%
YTD
8.20%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTL vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTL and PTNQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.73

The correlation between DDTL and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTL vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTL
DDTL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PTNQ
PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTL vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDTLPTNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.19

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.64

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.03

5.24

+10.80

DDTL vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDTL and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDTL vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTL drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTL and PTNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTLPTNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-28.07%

+24.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.78%

-11.76%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-5.36%

+5.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.43%

-5.67%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

3.68%

-2.96%

Volatility

DDTL vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) is 0.99%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that DDTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTLPTNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

7.06%

-6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

14.53%

-10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.33%

17.94%

-12.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.53%

13.59%

-8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.53%

16.54%

-11.01%

DDTL vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTL vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDTL
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
0.81%0.88%1.96%1.47%0.62%0.00%0.16%0.44%0.45%0.32%0.30%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTL and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTNQ has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to DDTL (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDTL dropped -3.78% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

On 1-year performance, PTNQ leads with 19.24% vs 11.58% for DDTL. On fees, PTNQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DDTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 19.24% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTNQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.

DDTL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTL and 0.65% for PTNQ.

DDTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTL and PTNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer