DDTL vs. PJUL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DDTL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July) and PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Over the past year, DDTL returned 11.58% vs 11.15% for PJUL. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

DDTL vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DDTL having a 5.40% return and PJUL slightly higher at 5.43%.

DDTL

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.66%
• 6M: 5.00%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJUL

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 4.66%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 1Y: 11.15%
• 3Y*: 12.27%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTL vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July	5.40%	4.70%
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July	5.43%	5.88%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTL and PJUL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.81

The correlation between DDTL and PJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DDTL vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTL

DDTL Risk / Return Rank: 85
DDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PJUL

PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 87
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTL vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDTL	PJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.25	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.34	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.47	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	3.07	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.03	17.26	-1.22

DDTL vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDTL and PJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DDTL vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTL drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTL and PJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTL	PJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-18.17%	+14.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.78%	-3.64%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.34%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-1.45%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.65%	+0.07%

Volatility

DDTL vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) is 0.99%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that DDTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DDTL	PJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.99%	1.10%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.06%	3.93%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.33%	4.98%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.53%	8.61%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.53%	9.97%	-4.44%

DDTL vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDTL and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

DDTL vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTL nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTL and PJUL in my portfolio?

DDTL and PJUL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DDTL or PJUL?

PJUL has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to DDTL (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDTL dropped -3.78% vs PJUL's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, DDTL or PJUL?

On 1-year performance, DDTL leads with 11.58% vs 11.15% for PJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, DDTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DDTL or PJUL?

Over the 1-year period, DDTL has performed better with a 11.58% return vs 11.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTL or PJUL?

DDTL and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTL or PJUL?

DDTL and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.