PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTL vs. JANB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTL vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTL achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than JANB's 6.08% return.


DDTL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.32%
YTD
4.57%
6M
5.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JANB

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.08%
6M
7.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTL vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTL and JANB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTL vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTL vs. JANB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTLJANBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.27

1.97

+0.31

Drawdowns

DDTL vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTL drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum JANB drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTL and JANB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTLJANBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-6.52%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-1.14%

+0.74%

Volatility

DDTL vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTLJANBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

7.41%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

7.41%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

7.41%

-1.95%

DDTL vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTL vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTL nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTL and JANB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

DDTL and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTL and 0.25% for JANB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTL and JANB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer