PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTJ vs. ZMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTJ vs. ZMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTJ

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMAY

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
1.80%
6M
2.27%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTJ vs. ZMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTJ and ZMAY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTJ vs. ZMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTJ

ZMAY
ZMAY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTJ vs. ZMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTJ vs. ZMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTJZMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

3.82

-2.38

Drawdowns

DDTJ vs. ZMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTJ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, which is greater than ZMAY's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTJ and ZMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTJZMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-0.45%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.45%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-0.05%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

Volatility

DDTJ vs. ZMAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTJZMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

1.52%

+6.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.99%

1.57%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.99%

1.57%

+6.42%

DDTJ vs. ZMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDTJ and ZMAY have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

DDTJ vs. ZMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTJ nor ZMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTJ and ZMAY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDTJ and ZMAY have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

DDTJ and ZMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTJ and ZMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer