DDTJ vs. PMAP

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

DDTJ (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January) and PMAP (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMAP.

Performance

DDTJ vs. PMAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDTJ

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PMAP

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 3.13%
• 6M: 3.59%
• 1Y: 7.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTJ vs. PMAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDTJ Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January	4.65%
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTJ and PMAP is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

DDTJ vs. PMAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAP

PMAP Risk / Return Rank: 99
PMAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTJ vs. PMAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDTJ	PMAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	3.15	-1.72

Drawdowns

DDTJ vs. PMAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTJ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, which is greater than PMAP's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTJ and PMAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTJ	PMAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-1.75%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.20%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-0.08%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTJ	PMAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.99%	1.17%	+6.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.99%	2.33%	+5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.99%	2.33%	+5.66%

DDTJ vs. PMAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDTJ vs. PMAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTJ nor PMAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTJ and PMAP in my portfolio?

DDTJ and PMAP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDTJ or PMAP?

On fees, PMAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTJ or PMAP?

PMAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTJ or PMAP?

DDTJ and PMAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDTJ and PMAP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTJ and 0.50% for PMAP.