DDTF vs. OILK
DDTF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. DDTF is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Their -0.42 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DDTF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for OILK.
Performance
DDTF vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDTF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- 6M
- 35.52%
- YTD
- 52.43%
- 1Y
- 38.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.38K | $34.70K | $113.64K | |
| $7.09M | $6.91M | $10.69M |
DDTF vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDTF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February | 5.82% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF | 35.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTF and OILK is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTF vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
DDTF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILK
DDTF vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTF | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTF vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTF | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -83.76% | +78.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -10.57% | +10.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -32.28% | +31.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.49% | — |
Volatility
DDTF vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTF | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.39% | 30.21% | -21.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.39% | 30.46% | -22.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.39% | 35.99% | -27.60% |
DDTF vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTF vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
DDTF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDTF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF | 8.37% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTF and OILK have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTF.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 0.00% for DDTF.
DDTF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.69% for OILK.
Find the right allocation for DDTF and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer