PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTF vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTF vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTF

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.28%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAPR

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.21%
YTD
10.81%
6M
11.74%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTF vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTF and BAPR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.92

DDTF vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDTF
BAPR

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

DDTF
36.2%
BAPR
36.2%

Financial Services

DDTF
11.9%
BAPR
11.9%

Communication Services

DDTF
10.9%
BAPR
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DDTF
10.1%
BAPR
10.1%

Healthcare

DDTF
8.4%
BAPR
8.4%

Industrials

DDTF
8.1%
BAPR
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDTF
4.9%
BAPR
4.9%

Energy

DDTF
3.5%
BAPR
3.5%

Utilities

DDTF
2.3%
BAPR
2.3%

Real Estate

DDTF
1.9%
BAPR
1.9%

Basic Materials

DDTF
1.8%
BAPR
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTF vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTF

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTF vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTF vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTFBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.84

+0.77

Drawdowns

DDTF vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and BAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTFBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-23.91%

+18.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.23%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-2.59%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

Volatility

DDTF vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTFBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

5.64%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.72%

11.49%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.72%

13.12%

-4.40%

DDTF vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDTF and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

DDTF vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTF nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DDTF and BAPR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDTF and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

DDTF and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTF and BAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer