PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDS vs. WDH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DDS vs. WDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Waterdrop Inc. (WDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDS achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than WDH's -24.98% return.


DDS

1D
-0.70%
1M
14.47%
YTD
0.66%
6M
-10.45%
1Y
58.44%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
35.97%
10Y*
30.59%

WDH

1D
-0.71%
1M
-11.39%
YTD
-24.98%
6M
-20.37%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
-14.35%
5Y*
-27.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDS vs. WDH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DDS
Dillard's, Inc.
0.66%46.81%13.47%32.05%38.66%142.50%
WDH
Waterdrop Inc.
-24.98%66.25%19.17%-68.77%141.30%-86.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DDS and WDH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2021

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DDS:

$9.52B

WDH:

$51.89M

EPS

DDS:

$42.07

WDH:

CN¥2.18

PE Ratio

DDS:

14.50

WDH:

4.35

PS Ratio

DDS:

1.45

WDH:

0.62

PB Ratio

DDS:

3.66

WDH:

0.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

DDS:

$6.58B

WDH:

CN¥3.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DDS:

$1.82B

WDH:

CN¥2.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

DDS:

$985.80M

WDH:

CN¥369.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDS vs. WDH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDS
DDS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

WDH
WDH Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
WDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDH Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDH Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDS vs. WDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Waterdrop Inc. (WDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDSWDHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.17

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.60

0.36

+5.24

DDS vs. WDH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the WDH Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDS and WDH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDS vs. WDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDS drawdown since its inception was -93.62%, roughly equal to the maximum WDH drawdown of -91.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDS and WDH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDSWDHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.62%

-91.12%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.27%

-29.00%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.02%

-62.60%

+20.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.71%

-88.67%

+38.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.84%

-84.92%

+72.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.61%

-81.15%

+45.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.47%

13.81%

-3.34%

Volatility

DDS vs. WDH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) is 10.15%, while Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) has a volatility of 13.33%. This indicates that DDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDSWDHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.15%

13.33%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.84%

24.40%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.57%

44.58%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.28%

61.87%

-11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.53%

62.73%

-3.20%

Dividends

DDS vs. WDH - Dividend Comparison

DDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than WDH's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDS
Dillard's, Inc.
5.11%5.13%6.02%5.18%4.89%6.41%0.95%0.68%0.66%0.57%0.45%0.40%
WDH
Waterdrop Inc.
4.29%2.63%5.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DDS vs. WDH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dillard's, Inc. and Waterdrop Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.57B
1.39B
(DDS) Total Revenue
(WDH) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DDS values in USD, WDH values in CNY

DDS vs. WDH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dillard's, Inc. and Waterdrop Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
52.0%
Portfolio components
DDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WDH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported a gross profit of 723.78M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

DDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

WDH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported an operating income of 82.71M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

DDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a net income of 250.60M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

WDH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported a net income of 159.88M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDS and WDH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDH has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to DDS (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDS dropped -93.62% vs WDH's -91.12%.

DDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDS and WDH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer