DDS vs. ESLT
DDS (Dillard's, Inc.) and ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd) are both stocks. DDS operates in Department Stores (Consumer Cyclical), while ESLT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, DDS returned 30.59%/yr vs 26.53%/yr for ESLT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DDS vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDS achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than ESLT's 48.00% return. Over the past 10 years, DDS has outperformed ESLT with an annualized return of 30.59%, while ESLT has yielded a comparatively lower 26.53% annualized return.
DDS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- -10.45%
- 1Y
- 58.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.17%
- 5Y*
- 35.97%
- 10Y*
- 30.59%
ESLT
- 1D
- -6.48%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 48.00%
- 6M
- 66.16%
- 1Y
- 98.98%
- 3Y*
- 60.86%
- 5Y*
- 46.38%
- 10Y*
- 26.53%
DDS vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDS Dillard's, Inc. | 0.66% | 46.81% | 13.47% | 32.05% | 38.66% | 306.41% | -12.71% | 22.76% | 0.97% | -3.63% |
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 48.00% | 125.14% | 22.17% | 31.30% | -4.82% | 34.77% | -14.56% | 37.62% | -13.22% | 32.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDS and ESLT is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 1996 | 0.18 |
The correlation between DDS and ESLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DDS:
$9.52B
ESLT:
$41.10B
DDS:
$42.07
ESLT:
$12.36
DDS:
14.50
ESLT:
69.08
DDS:
1.45
ESLT:
4.93
DDS:
3.66
ESLT:
9.65
DDS:
$6.58B
ESLT:
$8.23B
DDS:
$1.82B
ESLT:
$2.03B
DDS:
$985.80M
ESLT:
$861.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDS vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank
DDS
ESLT
DDS vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDS | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.83 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 10.61 | -5.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDS vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDS drawdown since its inception was -93.62%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDS and ESLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDS | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.62% | -53.79% | -39.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.27% | -25.98% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.02% | -25.98% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.71% | -32.89% | -16.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.57% | -32.89% | -43.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.84% | -15.71% | +2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.61% | -13.91% | -21.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 9.36% | +1.11% |
Volatility
DDS vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) is 10.15%, while Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a volatility of 19.89%. This indicates that DDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDS | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 19.89% | -9.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.84% | 35.93% | -8.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.57% | 44.11% | -4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.28% | 33.66% | +16.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.53% | 29.42% | +30.11% |
Dividends
DDS vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison
DDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than ESLT's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDS Dillard's, Inc. | 5.11% | 5.13% | 6.02% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 6.41% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.66% | 0.57% | 0.45% | 0.40% |
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 0.36% | 0.47% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.57% | 1.63% |
Financials
DDS vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dillard's, Inc. and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DDS vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison
DDS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ESLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.
DDS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ESLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
DDS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a net income of 250.60M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
ESLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDS and ESLT have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESLT has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to DDS (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDS dropped -93.62% vs ESLT's -53.79%.
ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDS and ESLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer