DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE
DDOC.DE (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD) and XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - DDOC.DE tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health while XDG3.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DDOC.DE returned -5.09%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for XDG3.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDOC.DE charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDG3.DE.
Performance
DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDOC.DE achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly higher than XDG3.DE's -6.02% return.
DDOC.DE
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -5.71%
- 1Y
- 0.32%
- 3Y*
- -5.09%
- 5Y*
- -9.54%
- 10Y*
- —
XDG3.DE
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DDOC.DE Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD | -1.35% | -2.99% | 3.18% | -17.53% |
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C | -6.02% | 1.47% | 9.58% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDOC.DE and XDG3.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between DDOC.DE and XDG3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DDOC.DE
XDG3.DE
DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDOC.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 0.17 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 0.44 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDOC.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.16 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 0.16 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDOC.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than XDG3.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDOC.DE and XDG3.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDOC.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -20.49% | -39.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.33% | -13.31% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.67% | -20.49% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.22% | -11.91% | -39.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -5.57% | -36.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.98% | 5.29% | +5.69% |
Volatility
DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) at 4.95%. This indicates that DDOC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDG3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDOC.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 4.95% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 10.56% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 14.57% | +6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 13.31% | +10.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 13.31% | +10.95% |
DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDOC.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XDG3.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDOC.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDOC.DE nor XDG3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDOC.DE and XDG3.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDG3.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDG3.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DDOC.DE.
DDOC.DE tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health, while XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DDOC.DE and 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
Find the right allocation for DDOC.DE and XDG3.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer