DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE
DDOC.DE (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD) and CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - DDOC.DE tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health while CBUF.DE tracks the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DDOC.DE returned -9.54%/yr vs 4.66%/yr for CBUF.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDOC.DE charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CBUF.DE.
Performance
DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDOC.DE achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly higher than CBUF.DE's -2.22% return.
DDOC.DE
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -5.71%
- 1Y
- 0.32%
- 3Y*
- -5.09%
- 5Y*
- -9.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDOC.DE Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD | -1.35% | -2.99% | 3.18% | -14.12% | -25.03% | -20.13% |
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | -2.22% | 2.56% | 0.75% | 0.33% | 2.09% | 24.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDOC.DE and CBUF.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between DDOC.DE and CBUF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DDOC.DE
CBUF.DE
DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDOC.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.10 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 0.68 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 1.56 | -1.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDOC.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.53 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 0.34 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 0.44 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDOC.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than CBUF.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDOC.DE and CBUF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDOC.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -25.94% | -33.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.33% | -10.87% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.67% | -21.76% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.96% | -21.76% | -32.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.22% | -9.66% | -41.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -5.65% | -36.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.98% | 4.74% | +6.24% |
Volatility
DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) at 4.98%. This indicates that DDOC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDOC.DE | CBUF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 4.98% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 9.70% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 13.98% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 13.60% | +10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 15.36% | +8.90% |
DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDOC.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUF.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDOC.DE vs. CBUF.DE - Dividend Comparison
DDOC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 0.10% |
DDOC.DE Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDOC.DE and CBUF.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DDOC.DE.
DDOC.DE tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health, while CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DDOC.DE and 0.18% for CBUF.DE.
Find the right allocation for DDOC.DE and CBUF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer