DDNQ vs. MU

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

DDNQ (Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) is Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DDNQ vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDNQ) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDNQ

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 3.98%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MU

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: 183.94%
• YTD: 243.32%
• 1Y: 687.66%
• 3Y*: 149.71%
• 5Y*: 66.39%
• 10Y*: 54.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDNQ vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDNQ Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	4.14%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	243.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DDNQ and MU is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026	0.43

Return for Risk

DDNQ vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDNQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDNQ vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDNQ) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDNQ	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	9.29	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.69	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	23.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	83.25	—

Drawdowns

DDNQ vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDNQ drawdown since its inception was -5.65%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDNQ and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDNQ	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-98.25%	+92.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-30.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-57.63%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-19.29%	+18.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-58.07%	+57.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDNQ	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	33.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	62.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	75.68%	-65.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.72%	54.75%	-45.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.72%	50.65%	-40.93%

Dividends

DDNQ vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

DDNQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DDNQ Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.05%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDNQ and MU in my portfolio?

DDNQ and MU have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.