DDNQ vs. LVHI
DDNQ (Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDNQ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while LVHI is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. DDNQ is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DDNQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
DDNQ vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDNQ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- 36.20%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.87K | $261.14K | $389.29K | |
| $37.17M | $30.23M | $26.64M |
DDNQ vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between DDNQ and LVHI is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDNQ vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
DDNQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LVHI
DDNQ vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDNQ) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDNQ | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.71 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 24.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDNQ vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDNQ drawdown since its inception was -5.79%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDNQ and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDNQ | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -32.31% | +26.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -0.70% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -3.47% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.45% | — |
Volatility
DDNQ vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDNQ | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.61% | 9.46% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.61% | 11.05% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.61% | 13.70% | -3.09% |
DDNQ vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDNQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDNQ vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
DDNQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDNQ Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.51% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDNQ and LVHI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDNQ.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 0.00% for DDNQ.
DDNQ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LVHI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDNQ and 0.40% for LVHI.
Find the right allocation for DDNQ and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer