DDM vs. SOXL
DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - DDM tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DDM returned 20.48%/yr vs 64.56%/yr for SOXL. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
DDM vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 450.61% return. Over the past 10 years, DDM has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 20.48%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 64.56% annualized return.
DDM
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 41.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 20.48%
SOXL
- 1D
- -23.06%
- 1M
- 21.44%
- YTD
- 450.61%
- 6M
- 429.57%
- 1Y
- 976.09%
- 3Y*
- 120.84%
- 5Y*
- 42.16%
- 10Y*
- 64.56%
DDM vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 13.14% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -19.48% | 41.97% | 2.14% | 47.98% | -13.46% | 59.56% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 450.61% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDM and SOXL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.65 |
The correlation between DDM and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DDM vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDM
SOXL
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DDM
SOXL
-
Industrials
DDM
SOXL
-
Technology
DDM
SOXL
Healthcare
DDM
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
DDM
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
DDM
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
DDM
SOXL
-
Energy
DDM
SOXL
-
Communication Services
DDM
SOXL
-
Real Estate
DDM
-
SOXL
-
Utilities
DDM
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDM vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
DDM
SOXL
DDM vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.58 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 22.69 | -20.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 72.83 | -64.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDM vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.70% | -90.46% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.31% | -43.47% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -87.88% | +56.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.18% | -90.46% | +50.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.13% | -90.46% | +27.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -23.06% | +21.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -34.95% | +17.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | 13.52% | -8.26% |
Volatility
DDM vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) is 8.37%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 68.39%. This indicates that DDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 68.39% | -60.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 99.84% | -80.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.90% | 116.79% | -91.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 110.35% | -80.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.76% | 100.62% | -65.86% |
DDM vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDM vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDM and SOXL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (68.39%) compared to DDM (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 64.56% vs 20.48% for DDM. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 64.56% return vs 20.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.
DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.45 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDM and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer