DDM vs. NTSD
DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DDM is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
DDM vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDM
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 38.50%
- 3Y*
- 26.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 20.52%
NTSD
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDM vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 24.00% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDM and NTSD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDM vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
DDM
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DDM vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDM vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.70% | -5.58% | -76.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -3.31% | +2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -1.12% | -16.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | — | — |
Volatility
DDM vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.85% | 24.95% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.62% | 24.95% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.76% | 24.95% | +9.81% |
DDM vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDM vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDM and NTSD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.
DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for DDM and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer