PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDM vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDM vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDM

1D
-2.29%
1M
7.27%
YTD
9.35%
6M
9.82%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
24.94%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
19.50%

NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDM vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDM and NTSD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDM vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDM vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDMNTSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.97

DDM vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDMNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

5.08

-4.69

Drawdowns

DDM vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDMNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-5.20%

-76.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-1.11%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-0.84%

-16.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

Volatility

DDM vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDMNTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.25%

24.28%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.53%

24.28%

+5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.76%

24.28%

+10.48%

DDM vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDM vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
0.91%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
NTSD
WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDM and NTSD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.

DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDM and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer