PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, DDLS has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 9.73%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.


DDLS

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.35%
YTD
5.70%
6M
8.32%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
9.73%

XLV

1D
0.79%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDLS vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
5.70%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-4.29%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and XLV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2016

0.46

The correlation between DDLS and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDLS vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDLS
XLV

Industrials

25.1%

-

Financial Services

12.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%

-

Basic Materials

8.0%

-

Technology

7.8%

-

Real Estate

6.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.9%

-

Communication Services

3.7%

-

Energy

3.2%

-

Healthcare

2.7%
100.0%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Industrials

DDLS
25.1%
XLV

-

Financial Services

DDLS
12.9%
XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

DDLS
11.2%
XLV

-

Basic Materials

DDLS
8.0%
XLV

-

Technology

DDLS
7.8%
XLV

-

Real Estate

DDLS
6.3%
XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

DDLS
5.9%
XLV

-

Communication Services

DDLS
3.7%
XLV

-

Energy

DDLS
3.2%
XLV

-

Healthcare

DDLS
2.7%
XLV
100.0%

Utilities

DDLS
2.0%
XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDLS vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDLSXLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

0.88

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

1.42

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.16

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.24

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.89

2.99

+4.90

DDLS vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDLSXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

0.88

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.38

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.56

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.46

+0.18

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-39.17%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-10.47%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-17.11%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-17.11%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-28.40%

-8.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-7.52%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-7.12%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

4.32%

-1.47%

Volatility

DDLS vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) is 3.89%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that DDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

4.10%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

10.24%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

14.67%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

14.69%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

16.55%

-0.96%

DDLS vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than XLV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.54%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.70%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and XLV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to DDLS (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs XLV's -39.17%.

On 10-year performance, DDLS leads with 9.73% vs 9.20% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDLS has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.70% for XLV.

DDLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 0.08% for XLV.

DDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer