PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 21.25% return. Over the past 10 years, DDLS has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 9.82%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.00% annualized return.


DDLS

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.38%
6M
2.11%
YTD
6.18%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
9.82%
ALL TIME*
9.77%

DXJ

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.63%
6M
14.45%
YTD
21.25%
1Y
49.27%
3Y*
30.10%
5Y*
27.38%
10Y*
19.00%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$690.04K$775.99K$927.24K
$66.09M$60.67M$58.46M

DDLS vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
6.18%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
21.25%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and DXJ is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016

0.66

The correlation between DDLS and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDLS vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDLS
DXJ

Industrials

28.1%
29.5%

Financial Services

13.8%
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
13.3%

Basic Materials

9.1%
9.1%

Technology

9.0%
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.7%

Real Estate

7.5%

-

Communication Services

4.1%
2.3%

Healthcare

3.6%
6.8%

Energy

2.4%
1.7%

Utilities

2.0%
0.1%

Industrials

DDLS
28.1%
DXJ
29.5%

Financial Services

DDLS
13.8%
DXJ
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DDLS
12.8%
DXJ
13.3%

Basic Materials

DDLS
9.1%
DXJ
9.1%

Technology

DDLS
9.0%
DXJ
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

DDLS
7.7%
DXJ
4.7%

Real Estate

DDLS
7.5%
DXJ

-

Communication Services

DDLS
4.1%
DXJ
2.3%

Healthcare

DDLS
3.6%
DXJ
6.8%

Energy

DDLS
2.4%
DXJ
1.7%

Utilities

DDLS
2.0%
DXJ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDLS vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDLSDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

4.30

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

16.08

-11.02

DDLS vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-49.63%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-10.98%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-22.19%

+10.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-22.19%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-39.14%

+2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-3.40%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-14.24%

+8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.93%

+0.20%

Volatility

DDLS vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) is 3.33%, while WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that DDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

6.07%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

14.35%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

18.07%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

19.07%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

19.93%

-4.48%

DDLS vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDLS and DXJ have an expense ratio of 0.48%.


Dividends

DDLS vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than DXJ's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.64%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
0.97%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and DXJ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXJ has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to DDLS (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 19.00% vs 9.82% for DDLS. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 19.00% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDLS and DXJ have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.97% for DXJ.

DDLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer