PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. CGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. CGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than CGV's 12.00% return.


DDLS

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.35%
YTD
5.70%
6M
8.32%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
9.73%

CGV

1D
-1.42%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
12.00%
6M
14.03%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDLS vs. CGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
5.70%27.97%10.22%15.25%-2.27%
CGV
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
12.00%23.11%-3.34%5.72%3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and CGV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022

0.76

The correlation between DDLS and CGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDLS vs. CGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDLS
CGV

Industrials

25.1%
14.9%

Financial Services

12.9%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.1%

Basic Materials

8.0%
21.1%

Technology

7.8%
9.3%

Real Estate

6.3%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
14.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.2%

Energy

3.2%
12.7%

Healthcare

2.7%
5.3%

Utilities

2.0%
3.9%

Industrials

DDLS
25.1%
CGV
14.9%

Financial Services

DDLS
12.9%
CGV
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DDLS
11.2%
CGV
10.1%

Basic Materials

DDLS
8.0%
CGV
21.1%

Technology

DDLS
7.8%
CGV
9.3%

Real Estate

DDLS
6.3%
CGV
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

DDLS
5.9%
CGV
14.3%

Communication Services

DDLS
3.7%
CGV
2.2%

Energy

DDLS
3.2%
CGV
12.7%

Healthcare

DDLS
2.7%
CGV
5.3%

Utilities

DDLS
2.0%
CGV
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. CGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CGV
CGV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDLS vs. CGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDLSCGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.98

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.65

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.30

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.89

8.42

-0.53

DDLS vs. CGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the CGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and CGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDLSCGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.98

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.77

-0.13

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. CGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than CGV's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and CGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSCGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-16.64%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-12.13%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-16.64%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-3.75%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-3.65%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.31%

-0.46%

Volatility

DDLS vs. CGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) is 3.89%, while Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that DDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSCGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

5.19%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

11.66%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

14.08%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

13.53%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

13.53%

+2.06%

DDLS vs. CGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than CGV's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. CGV - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than CGV's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CGV
Conductor Global Equity Value ETF
4.90%4.58%2.87%4.56%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.54%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and CGV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGV has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to DDLS (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs CGV's -16.64%.

On 3-year performance, DDLS leads with 17.12% vs 12.42% for CGV. On fees, DDLS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DDLS has performed better with a 17.12% return vs 12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDLS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for CGV.

CGV has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.54% for DDLS.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Conductor Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 1.25% for CGV.

CGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and CGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer