DDFY vs. UXJA
DDFY (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May) and UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. DDFY is passively managed, while UXJA is actively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DDFY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJA.
Performance
DDFY vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDFY
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
UXJA
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.39K | $255.98K | $1.06M | |
| $51.27K | $61.71K | $87.60K |
DDFY vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDFY Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May | 0.72% |
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFY and UXJA is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFY vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank
DDFY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UXJA
DDFY vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May (DDFY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFY | UXJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFY vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFY drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFY and UXJA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFY | UXJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -20.01% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -1.99% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -2.90% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.49% | — |
Volatility
DDFY vs. UXJA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFY | UXJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.43% | 14.56% | -9.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 18.35% | -12.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 18.35% | -12.92% |
DDFY vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJA's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFY vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFY nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFY and UXJA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.
DDFY and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFY and 0.85% for UXJA.
Find the right allocation for DDFY and UXJA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer