DDFS vs. SFLR
DDFS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFS is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
DDFS vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFS achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.29% return.
DDFS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 14.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFS vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September | 3.49% | 3.42% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 3.29% | 5.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFS and SFLR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFS vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
DDFS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SFLR
DDFS vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September (DDFS) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFS | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFS vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFS drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFS and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFS | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -12.13% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -2.74% | +2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -1.75% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility
DDFS vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFS | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 9.69% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 10.32% | -6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 10.32% | -6.33% |
DDFS vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFS vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
DDFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDFS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFS and SFLR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for DDFS.
DDFS is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFS and 0.89% for SFLR.
Find the right allocation for DDFS and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer