DDFS vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DDFS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

DDFS vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September (DDFS) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DDFS having a 3.49% return and FBUF slightly higher at 3.62%.

DDFS

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 3.49%
• 6M: 3.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 3.09%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFS vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDFS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September	3.49%	3.42%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	3.62%	6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between DDFS and FBUF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

DDFS vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFS vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September (DDFS) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDFS	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.59	—

Drawdowns

DDFS vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFS drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFS and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDFS	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-11.09%	+8.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-1.83%	+1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-1.38%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDFS	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.99%	8.11%	-4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.99%	9.69%	-5.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.99%	9.69%	-5.70%

DDFS vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDFS vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

DDFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DDFS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDFS and FBUF in my portfolio?

DDFS and FBUF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDFS or FBUF?

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDFS or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDFS or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for DDFS.

What is the main difference between DDFS and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFS and 0.48% for FBUF.