DDFN vs. UXJA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DDFN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November) and UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDFN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJA.

Performance

DDFN vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFN achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than UXJA's 8.51% return.

DDFN

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 4.25%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UXJA

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 6M: 7.34%
• 1Y: 24.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFN vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDFN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November	4.25%	0.74%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	8.51%	-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DDFN and UXJA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

DDFN vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 58
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFN vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDFN	UXJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.77	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.61	—

Drawdowns

DDFN vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFN drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFN and UXJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDFN	UXJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-20.01%	+16.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-3.47%	+2.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.47%	-2.94%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDFN	UXJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.33%	14.19%	-8.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.33%	18.69%	-13.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.33%	18.69%	-13.36%

DDFN vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJA's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDFN vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFN nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDFN and UXJA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DDFN and UXJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DDFN or UXJA?

On fees, DDFN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDFN or UXJA?

DDFN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDFN or UXJA?

DDFN and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDFN and UXJA?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFN and 0.85% for UXJA.