DDFL vs. ZMAR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DDFL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July) and ZMAR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

DDFL vs. ZMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFL achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than ZMAR's 2.63% return.

DDFL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 3.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZMAR

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 3.22%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFL vs. ZMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDFL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July	2.83%	4.76%
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	2.63%	3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DDFL and ZMAR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

DDFL vs. ZMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMAR

ZMAR Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ZMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFL vs. ZMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDFL	ZMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.59	2.27	+0.31

Drawdowns

DDFL vs. ZMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFL drawdown since its inception was -1.63%, smaller than the maximum ZMAR drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFL and ZMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDFL	ZMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-2.30%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.08%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.19%	-0.22%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDFL	ZMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25%	2.12%	+1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.25%	3.04%	+0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.25%	3.04%	+0.21%

DDFL vs. ZMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDFL and ZMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

DDFL vs. ZMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFL nor ZMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDFL and ZMAR in my portfolio?

DDFL and ZMAR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDFL or ZMAR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDFL or ZMAR?

DDFL and ZMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDFL or ZMAR?

DDFL and ZMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.