DDFL vs. MMAX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX).

DDFL and MMAX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DDFL is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 30, 2025. MMAX is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Mar 31, 2025.

Performance

DDFL vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DDFL vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDFL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July	0.15%	4.76%
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	1.18%	3.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFL achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than MMAX's 1.18% return.

DDFL

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMAX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFL vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.

DDFL

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July

MMAX

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF

Return for Risk

DDFL vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July (DDFL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDFL	MMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.90	2.75	-0.86

Correlation

The correlation between DDFL and MMAX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DDFL vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison

DDFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.

	TTM	2025
DDFL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	1.30%	1.31%

Drawdowns

DDFL vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFL drawdown since its inception was -1.63%, smaller than the maximum MMAX drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFL and MMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDFL	MMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-1.93%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.13%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.11%	-0.12%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDFL	MMAX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.50%	2.61%	+0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.50%	2.61%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.50%	2.61%	+0.89%