PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFJ vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - January (DDFJ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDFJ

1D
-0.78%
1M
0.36%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PJUL

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.66%
YTD
4.31%
6M
4.83%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFJ and PJUL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.79

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDFJ
PJUL

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

DDFJ
36.2%
PJUL
36.2%

Financial Services

DDFJ
11.9%
PJUL
11.9%

Communication Services

DDFJ
10.9%
PJUL
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DDFJ
10.1%
PJUL
10.1%

Healthcare

DDFJ
8.4%
PJUL
8.4%

Industrials

DDFJ
8.1%
PJUL
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDFJ
4.9%
PJUL
4.9%

Energy

DDFJ
3.5%
PJUL
3.5%

Utilities

DDFJ
2.3%
PJUL
2.3%

Real Estate

DDFJ
1.9%
PJUL
1.9%

Basic Materials

DDFJ
1.8%
PJUL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFJ vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFJ

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - January (DDFJ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFJPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.89

+0.41

Drawdowns

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFJ drawdown since its inception was -3.34%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFJ and PJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFJPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-18.17%

+14.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.41%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-1.47%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

Volatility

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFJPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.83%

5.64%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

8.60%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.83%

10.02%

-4.19%

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDFJ and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

DDFJ vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFJ nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DDFJ
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDFJ and PJUL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDFJ and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

DDFJ and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFJ and PJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer