DDFJ vs. BAPR

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

DDFJ (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - January) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. DDFJ is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

DDFJ vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - January (DDFJ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDFJ

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAPR

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 19.49%
• 3Y*: 14.92%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFJ vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDFJ Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - January	3.11%
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DDFJ and BAPR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026	0.79

DDFJ vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDFJ	BAPR
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

DDFJ vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFJ vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - January (DDFJ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDFJ	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	0.82	+0.48

Drawdowns

DDFJ vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFJ drawdown since its inception was -3.34%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFJ and BAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDFJ	BAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.34%	-23.91%	+20.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-1.05%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-2.59%	+2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDFJ	BAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.83%	5.73%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.83%	11.49%	-5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.83%	13.12%	-7.29%

DDFJ vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDFJ and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

DDFJ vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFJ nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDFJ and BAPR in my portfolio?

DDFJ and BAPR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDFJ or BAPR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDFJ or BAPR?

DDFJ and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDFJ or BAPR?

DDFJ and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.