DDFD vs. PJUL
DDFD (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - December) and PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - DDFD tracks the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) while PJUL tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
DDFD vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFD achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than PJUL's 5.13% return.
DDFD
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 4.74%
- 1Y
- 11.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- —
DDFD vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFD Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - December | 4.32% | 0.82% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 5.13% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFD and PJUL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFD vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank
DDFD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PJUL
DDFD vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - December (DDFD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFD | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFD vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFD drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFD and PJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFD | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -18.17% | +15.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -1.46% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility
DDFD vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFD | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.01% | 4.93% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 8.61% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 9.99% | -4.98% |
DDFD vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DDFD and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
DDFD vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFD nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDFD Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFD and PJUL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFD and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
DDFD and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDFD tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July.
Find the right allocation for DDFD and PJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer