PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDEC vs. TDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDEC vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDEC achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than TDEC's 9.14% return.


DDEC

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.98%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.94%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*

TDEC

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.54%
YTD
9.14%
6M
11.08%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDEC vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDEC and TDEC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024

0.65

The correlation between DDEC and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDEC vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDEC
DDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDEC vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDECTDECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

2.41

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

3.34

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.54

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

2.97

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.48

13.07

+6.41

DDEC vs. TDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the TDEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDEC and TDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDECTDECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.41

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.81

-0.55

Drawdowns

DDEC vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, roughly equal to the maximum TDEC drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDEC and TDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDECTDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-10.30%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-8.16%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.33%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-1.04%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.85%

-1.02%

Volatility

DDEC vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) is 0.88%, while FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that DDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDECTDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

2.81%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.36%

9.02%

-4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.79%

10.09%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.02%

11.75%

-4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.87%

11.75%

-4.88%

DDEC vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDEC vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDEC nor TDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDEC and TDEC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDEC has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to DDEC (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDEC dropped -10.22% vs TDEC's -10.30%.

On 1-year performance, TDEC leads with 24.15% vs 16.08% for DDEC. On fees, DDEC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DDEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDEC has performed better with a 24.15% return vs 16.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDEC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

DDEC and TDEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DDEC tracks S&P 500, while TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DDEC and 0.95% for TDEC.

DDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDEC and TDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer