PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCSVX vs. NSDVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCSVX vs. NSDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Small Cap Value Fund (DCSVX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DCSVX having a 21.97% return and NSDVX slightly higher at 22.08%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DCSVX having a 7.36% annualized return and NSDVX not far behind at 7.16%.


DCSVX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.91%
6M
12.62%
YTD
21.97%
1Y
38.88%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
7.36%
ALL TIME*
5.23%

NSDVX

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.07%
6M
13.21%
YTD
22.08%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
7.16%
ALL TIME*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DCSVX vs. NSDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCSVX
Dunham Small Cap Value Fund
21.97%8.67%-8.49%14.23%-13.01%31.15%-3.67%20.13%-12.04%7.93%
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
22.08%-1.31%9.25%8.06%-6.36%16.16%6.51%16.13%-12.35%8.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DCSVX and NSDVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013

0.85

The correlation between DCSVX and NSDVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCSVX vs. NSDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DCSVX
DCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NSDVX
NSDVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NSDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NSDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DCSVX vs. NSDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Small Cap Value Fund (DCSVX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCSVXNSDVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.54

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

7.60

+5.44

DCSVX vs. NSDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the NSDVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCSVX and NSDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCSVX vs. NSDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCSVX drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than NSDVX's maximum drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCSVX and NSDVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCSVXNSDVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.83%

-38.64%

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.55%

-10.48%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.13%

-16.41%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.13%

-21.27%

-15.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.71%

-38.64%

-8.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-2.21%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-6.48%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.50%

-0.73%

Volatility

DCSVX vs. NSDVX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham Small Cap Value Fund (DCSVX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) have volatilities of 3.64% and 3.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCSVXNSDVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

3.73%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

9.54%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

14.68%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

16.02%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

17.75%

+5.55%

DCSVX vs. NSDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCSVX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than NSDVX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCSVX vs. NSDVX - Dividend Comparison

DCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than NSDVX's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCSVX
Dunham Small Cap Value Fund
6.12%7.47%0.00%3.00%10.28%13.90%0.21%0.00%15.82%12.82%3.28%3.92%
NSDVX
North Star Dividend Fund
2.75%3.45%7.00%2.52%6.57%3.31%1.52%2.64%6.87%2.48%4.67%3.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCSVX and NSDVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSDVX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to DCSVX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCSVX dropped -62.83% vs NSDVX's -38.64%.

DCSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCSVX and NSDVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer