PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Documentation

DCS.TO (Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF) and DRMU.TO (Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCS.TO is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Desjardins, while DRMU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Desjardins. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DCS.TO returned 2.13%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for DRMU.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (DCS.TO) and Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCS.TO achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than DRMU.TO's 12.75% return.

DCS.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.06%
6M
0.84%
YTD
1.16%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
—

DRMU.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.85%
6M
9.72%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
14.19%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DCS.TO
Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF		1.16%3.51%5.74%4.72%-4.00%-0.81%4.93%3.23%0.78%
DRMU.TO
Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		12.75%11.60%34.78%24.94%-16.67%26.25%20.57%24.54%-8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DCS.TO and DRMU.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018

0.05

Over the past year, DCS.TO and DRMU.TO have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF

Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Often compared with DCS.TO:
DCS.TO vs. DANC.TODCS.TO vs. DCG.TODCS.TO vs. DCP.TODCS.TO vs. DRFD.TODCS.TO vs. DRFE.TODCS.TO vs. DRFG.TODCS.TO vs. DRFU.TO
Often compared with DRMU.TO:
DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TODRMU.TO vs. DRFE.TODRMU.TO vs. DANC.TODRMU.TO vs. DRFG.TODRMU.TO vs. COW.TODRMU.TO vs. DCBC.TODRMU.TO vs. DCG.TO

Return for Risk

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DCS.TO
DCS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DCS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DCS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO
DRMU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DRMU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (DCS.TO) and Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DCS.TODRMU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.64
1.87

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.40
2.67

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.62

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

9.31

-1.32

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the DRMU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCS.TO and DRMU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCS.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.05%, smaller than the maximum DRMU.TO drawdown of -24.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCS.TO and DRMU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DCS.TODRMU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-24.56%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.26%

-9.17%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.26%

-19.69%

+18.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.26%

-24.56%

+18.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.96%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-4.62%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

2.58%

-2.19%

Volatility

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (DCS.TO) is 0.48%, while Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU.TO) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that DCS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRMU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DCS.TODRMU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

4.06%

-3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

10.24%

-8.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90%

12.83%

-10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.50%

15.21%

-12.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

15.56%

-12.92%

Dividends

DCS.TO vs. DRMU.TO - Dividend Comparison

DCS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than DRMU.TO's 0.78% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCS.TO
Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF		2.77%2.77%2.59%2.49%2.66%2.49%2.41%2.47%2.55%1.69%
DRMU.TO
Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		0.78%0.85%0.77%1.04%1.17%1.08%1.25%1.34%0.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

DCS.TO and DRMU.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCS.TO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DRMU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCS.TO and DRMU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer