PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCRE vs. DCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCRE vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCRE achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 27.72% return.


DCRE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.17%
6M
1.38%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
6.02%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.98%

DCMT

1D
0.20%
1M
8.55%
6M
17.61%
YTD
27.72%
1Y
32.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$337.61K$272.59K$201.81K
$1.46M$1.65M$2.31M

DCRE vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DCRE
DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF
1.91%5.86%5.89%
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
27.72%6.04%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DCRE and DCMT is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCRE vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DCRE
DCRE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DCRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCRE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DCRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCRE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DCRE vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCREDCMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.28

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.39

1.94

+4.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.77

6.51

+16.25

DCRE vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCRE Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCRE and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCRE vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCRE drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCRE and DCMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCREDCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-15.96%

+15.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.68%

-15.96%

+15.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-8.32%

+8.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-3.61%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

4.75%

-4.56%

Volatility

DCRE vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCRE) is 0.38%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that DCRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCREDCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

5.43%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.96%

17.04%

-16.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19%

19.04%

-17.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.57%

16.04%

-14.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.57%

16.04%

-14.47%

DCRE vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCRE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCRE vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

DCRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than DCMT's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
2.88%3.67%1.59%0.00%
DCRE
DoubleLine Commercial Real Estate ETF
4.33%4.84%5.52%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCRE and DCMT have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCMT has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to DCRE (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCRE dropped -0.84% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 32.24% vs 4.06% for DCRE. On fees, DCRE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DCRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 32.24% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DCRE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

DCRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 2.88% for DCMT.

DCRE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DCMT is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DCRE and 0.66% for DCMT.

DCRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCRE and DCMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer