PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCPYX vs. TGRNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DCPYX vs. TGRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund (DCPYX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DCPYX vs. TGRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DCPYX
BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund
-0.56%7.04%1.39%6.14%-13.87%-1.00%9.80%11.19%1.33%
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
-0.50%6.76%3.08%5.73%-13.43%-0.60%8.57%9.15%1.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCPYX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than TGRNX's -0.50% return.


DCPYX

1D
0.33%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
1.86%

TGRNX

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
0.25%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DCPYX vs. TGRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCPYX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DCPYX vs. TGRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCPYX
DCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRNX
TGRNX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TGRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCPYX vs. TGRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund (DCPYX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCPYXTGRNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.25

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

1.83

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.02

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.17

7.18

-3.01

DCPYX vs. TGRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCPYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the TGRNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCPYX and TGRNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCPYXTGRNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.25

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.08

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.51

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between DCPYX and TGRNX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DCPYX vs. TGRNX - Dividend Comparison

DCPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than TGRNX's 3.97% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCPYX
BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund
4.21%4.59%3.58%2.94%2.74%3.04%2.71%3.11%3.25%0.22%
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
3.97%4.31%4.48%3.30%2.69%2.76%4.20%4.38%0.43%0.00%

Drawdowns

DCPYX vs. TGRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCPYX drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, which is greater than TGRNX's maximum drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCPYX and TGRNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DCPYXTGRNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-17.85%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-2.47%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-17.85%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-1.94%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-5.32%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.69%

+0.37%

Volatility

DCPYX vs. TGRNX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Core Plus Fund (DCPYX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) at 1.13%. This indicates that DCPYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DCPYXTGRNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.13%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

2.06%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

3.36%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.79%

4.82%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

4.84%

+0.02%