DCMT vs. RDTL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) and RDTL (GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while RDTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DCMT returned 28.33% vs 3.29% for RDTL. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. DCMT charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for RDTL.

Performance

DCMT vs. RDTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCMT achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly higher than RDTL's -45.63% return.

DCMT

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 21.60%
• YTD: 25.74%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDTL

• 1D: 5.45%
• 1M: 43.93%
• 6M: -51.29%
• YTD: -45.63%
• 1Y: 3.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCMT vs. RDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	25.74%	1.43%
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF	-45.63%	104.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DCMT and RDTL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

DCMT vs. RDTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 51
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

RDTL

RDTL Risk / Return Rank: 15
RDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
RDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 21
RDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCMT vs. RDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DCMT	RDTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.02	+1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.04	+1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.12	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	0.04	+1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.45	0.06	+6.40

DCMT vs. RDTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the RDTL Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCMT and RDTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DCMT vs. RDTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCMT drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum RDTL drawdown of -85.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMT and RDTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCMT	RDTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-85.21%	+69.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.96%	-85.21%	+69.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.74%	-66.91%	+57.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-45.96%	+42.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.40%	57.67%	-53.27%

Volatility

DCMT vs. RDTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) is 6.10%, while GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) has a volatility of 45.03%. This indicates that DCMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCMT	RDTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	45.03%	-38.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.86%	99.45%	-82.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.80%	134.45%	-115.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	143.19%	-127.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	143.19%	-127.16%

DCMT vs. RDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DCMT vs. RDTL - Dividend Comparison

DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while RDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.92%	3.67%	1.59%
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DCMT and RDTL in my portfolio?

DCMT and RDTL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DCMT or RDTL?

RDTL has higher volatility (45.03%) compared to DCMT (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCMT dropped -15.96% vs RDTL's -85.21%.

Which ETF is better, DCMT or RDTL?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 28.33% vs 3.29% for RDTL. On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, DCMT has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DCMT or RDTL?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DCMT or RDTL?

DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DCMT or RDTL?

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.00% for RDTL.

What is the main difference between DCMT and RDTL?

DCMT is categorized as Commodities, while RDTL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DCMT and 1.50% for RDTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.