PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCMB vs. DMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCMB vs. DMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCMB achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than DMBS's 0.51% return.


DCMB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
10Y*

DMBS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.61%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCMB vs. DMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DCMB
Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF
1.39%5.86%6.86%5.27%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
0.51%8.54%2.09%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DCMB and DMBS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

0.53

The correlation between DCMB and DMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCMB vs. DMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMB
DCMB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCMB vs. DMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCMBDMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.30

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.98

2.15

+4.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.78

7.62

+18.16

DCMB vs. DMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCMB Sharpe Ratio is 4.16, which is higher than the DMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCMB and DMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCMBDMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16

1.65

+2.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.90

0.62

+3.28

Drawdowns

DCMB vs. DMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCMB drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum DMBS drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMB and DMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCMBDMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-8.14%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.68%

-3.20%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.84%

-7.24%

+6.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.59%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-1.70%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.90%

-0.72%

Volatility

DCMB vs. DMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) is 0.47%, while Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that DCMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCMBDMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

1.61%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

3.02%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14%

4.18%

-3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.58%

6.28%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.58%

6.28%

-4.70%

DCMB vs. DMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCMB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DMBS's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCMB vs. DMBS - Dividend Comparison

DCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than DMBS's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DCMB
Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF
4.75%4.84%5.52%3.47%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
5.12%4.96%4.97%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCMB and DMBS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to DCMB (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCMB dropped -0.84% vs DMBS's -8.14%.

On 3-year performance, DCMB leads with 6.20% vs 4.62% for DMBS. On fees, DCMB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DCMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DCMB has performed better with a 6.20% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DCMB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.75% for DCMB.

DCMB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DMBS is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DCMB and 0.49% for DMBS.

DCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCMB and DMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer