DCLVX vs. SABTX
DCLVX (Dunham Large Cap Value Fund) and SABTX (SA U.S. Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DCLVX returned 9.87%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for SABTX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DCLVX charges 2.10%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for SABTX.
Performance
DCLVX vs. SABTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCLVX achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than SABTX's 17.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DCLVX has underperformed SABTX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while SABTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.
DCLVX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- 22.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
SABTX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
DCLVX vs. SABTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCLVX Dunham Large Cap Value Fund | 9.74% | 16.84% | 9.49% | 8.41% | -9.05% | 27.52% | 1.41% | 24.85% | -9.78% | 14.06% |
SABTX SA U.S. Value Fund | 17.93% | 17.69% | 11.32% | 11.82% | -6.35% | 27.06% | -2.04% | 24.85% | -12.14% | 18.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCLVX and SABTX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DCLVX and SABTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCLVX vs. SABTX — Risk / Return Rank
DCLVX
SABTX
DCLVX vs. SABTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DCLVX | SABTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.56 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 6.03 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 21.72 | -8.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DCLVX vs. SABTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCLVX drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, smaller than the maximum SABTX drawdown of -66.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCLVX and SABTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCLVX | SABTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -66.96% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.44% | -6.36% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | -16.63% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.16% | -20.42% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | -42.00% | +5.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -1.06% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -11.30% | +1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.74% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DCLVX vs. SABTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) is 3.62%, while SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that DCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SABTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCLVX | SABTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 4.07% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 8.70% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 12.00% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 16.38% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 19.14% | -2.08% |
DCLVX vs. SABTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCLVX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SABTX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCLVX vs. SABTX - Dividend Comparison
DCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than SABTX's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCLVX Dunham Large Cap Value Fund | 4.37% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 5.01% | 2.30% | 6.51% | 0.31% | 2.88% | 4.61% | 1.15% | 0.95% | 36.28% |
SABTX SA U.S. Value Fund | 3.29% | 3.88% | 2.60% | 1.67% | 7.66% | 4.25% | 1.52% | 5.14% | 9.80% | 10.36% | 5.08% | 6.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCLVX and SABTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SABTX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to DCLVX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCLVX dropped -58.91% vs SABTX's -66.96%.
SABTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCLVX and SABTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer