PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCLVX vs. PKAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCLVX vs. PKAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and PIMCO RAE US Fund (PKAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCLVX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than PKAIX's 23.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DCLVX has underperformed PKAIX with an annualized return of 9.46%, while PKAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.


DCLVX

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.89%
YTD
9.14%
6M
11.45%
1Y
25.26%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
9.46%

PKAIX

1D
0.72%
1M
6.84%
YTD
23.68%
6M
20.97%
1Y
43.85%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCLVX vs. PKAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCLVX
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund
9.14%16.84%9.49%8.41%-9.05%27.52%1.41%24.85%-9.78%14.06%
PKAIX
PIMCO RAE US Fund
23.68%17.19%16.28%17.02%-3.36%27.74%3.94%24.92%-6.92%16.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DCLVX and PKAIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2015

0.91

The correlation between DCLVX and PKAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCLVX vs. PKAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCLVX
DCLVX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DCLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DCLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PKAIX
PKAIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PKAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PKAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCLVX vs. PKAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and PIMCO RAE US Fund (PKAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCLVXPKAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

3.45

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

4.66

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.61

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

8.52

-5.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.97

26.24

-11.27

DCLVX vs. PKAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the PKAIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCLVX and PKAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCLVXPKAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.45

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.69

-0.35

Drawdowns

DCLVX vs. PKAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCLVX drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than PKAIX's maximum drawdown of -38.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCLVX and PKAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCLVXPKAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-38.56%

-20.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.44%

-5.15%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-20.31%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.16%

-20.64%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-38.56%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

0.00%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-4.72%

-4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.67%

+0.05%

Volatility

DCLVX vs. PKAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) is 2.92%, while PIMCO RAE US Fund (PKAIX) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that DCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PKAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCLVXPKAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.14%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

9.39%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

12.89%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

17.79%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

18.85%

-1.77%

DCLVX vs. PKAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCLVX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PKAIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCLVX vs. PKAIX - Dividend Comparison

DCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than PKAIX's 11.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCLVX
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund
4.39%4.80%0.00%5.01%2.30%6.51%0.31%2.88%4.61%1.15%0.95%36.28%
PKAIX
PIMCO RAE US Fund
11.13%13.77%16.77%6.65%8.09%10.03%3.20%4.91%6.85%5.85%5.33%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCLVX and PKAIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKAIX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to DCLVX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCLVX dropped -58.91% vs PKAIX's -38.56%.

PKAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCLVX and PKAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer