PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCLVX vs. NQCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCLVX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCLVX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, DCLVX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 9.46%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.


DCLVX

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.89%
YTD
9.14%
6M
11.45%
1Y
25.26%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
9.46%

NQCRX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.62%
YTD
15.38%
6M
18.13%
1Y
37.08%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCLVX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCLVX
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund
9.14%16.84%9.49%8.41%-9.05%27.52%1.41%24.85%-9.78%14.06%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
15.38%22.44%17.74%13.76%-1.07%25.38%-0.27%47.63%-15.47%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between DCLVX and NQCRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2006

0.94

The correlation between DCLVX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCLVX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCLVX
DCLVX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DCLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DCLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NQCRX
NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCLVX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCLVXNQCRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

3.03

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

4.18

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.53

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

6.29

-2.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.97

23.57

-8.60

DCLVX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCLVX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCLVXNQCRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.03

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.89

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.74

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.39

-0.05

Drawdowns

DCLVX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCLVX drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, roughly equal to the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCLVX and NQCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCLVXNQCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-57.85%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.44%

-6.07%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-17.21%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.16%

-17.61%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-41.84%

+4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-1.38%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-10.01%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.62%

+0.10%

Volatility

DCLVX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dunham Large Cap Value Fund (DCLVX) is 2.92%, while Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that DCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCLVXNQCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.81%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

9.52%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

12.38%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

15.60%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

18.93%

-1.85%

DCLVX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCLVX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is higher than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCLVX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

DCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than NQCRX's 6.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCLVX
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund
4.39%4.80%0.00%5.01%2.30%6.51%0.31%2.88%4.61%1.15%0.95%36.28%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
6.33%7.30%6.82%2.22%4.63%20.85%17.95%26.88%34.12%27.42%10.74%61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DCLVX and NQCRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to DCLVX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCLVX dropped -58.91% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCLVX and NQCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer