DCIBX vs. LSMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX).
DCIBX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 28, 2011. LSMSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 22, 2015.
Performance
DCIBX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DCIBX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCIBX DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.10% | 3.70% | 1.19% | 3.73% | -3.75% | -0.53% | 2.78% | 4.09% | 1.36% | 1.49% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | -0.27% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCIBX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than LSMSX's -0.27% return.
DCIBX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DCIBX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCIBX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DCIBX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
DCIBX
LSMSX
DCIBX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCIBX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 0.67 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 0.89 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.20 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.71 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 1.98 | +3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCIBX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 0.67 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.25 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between DCIBX and LSMSX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DCIBX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
DCIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than LSMSX's 3.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCIBX DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.75% | 2.44% | 2.06% | 1.69% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 1.34% | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.61% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.97% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DCIBX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCIBX drawdown since its inception was -7.97%, smaller than the maximum LSMSX drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCIBX and LSMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCIBX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -15.00% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -6.21% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.22% | -15.00% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -2.62% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -2.88% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 2.21% | -1.53% |
Volatility
DCIBX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA California Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DCIBX) is 0.73%, while Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that DCIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DCIBX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 1.10% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.10% | 1.60% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 5.78% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 4.44% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.35% | 4.52% | -2.17% |