PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCEMX vs. PDEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCEMX vs. PDEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DCEMX having a 33.14% return and PDEZX slightly higher at 34.27%. Over the past 10 years, DCEMX has underperformed PDEZX with an annualized return of 8.32%, while PDEZX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.


DCEMX

1D
2.47%
1M
9.86%
YTD
33.14%
6M
37.52%
1Y
60.81%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
8.32%

PDEZX

1D
1.62%
1M
5.26%
YTD
34.27%
6M
35.17%
1Y
50.38%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCEMX vs. PDEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
33.14%28.90%4.84%6.16%-25.20%-7.30%23.89%21.88%-20.99%32.42%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
34.27%14.88%18.48%16.12%-41.65%-0.86%72.88%30.33%-18.26%40.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DCEMX and PDEZX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2014

0.85

The correlation between DCEMX and PDEZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCEMX vs. PDEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCEMX
DCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PDEZX
PDEZX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PDEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCEMX vs. PDEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCEMXPDEZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.99

2.23

+0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

2.80

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

3.56

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.34

12.27

+4.06

DCEMX vs. PDEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the PDEZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCEMX and PDEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCEMXPDEZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

2.23

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.10

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.55

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.41

-0.18

Drawdowns

DCEMX vs. PDEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCEMX drawdown since its inception was -70.65%, which is greater than PDEZX's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCEMX and PDEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCEMXPDEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.65%

-54.95%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-13.94%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-21.92%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.04%

-52.88%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.88%

-54.95%

+9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.16%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-20.24%

-5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

4.04%

-0.36%

Volatility

DCEMX vs. PDEZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) is 8.96%, while PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that DCEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCEMXPDEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.96%

9.46%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

19.85%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

23.67%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

23.56%

-5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

22.25%

-3.97%

DCEMX vs. PDEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCEMX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PDEZX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCEMX vs. PDEZX - Dividend Comparison

DCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than PDEZX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
1.63%2.17%0.00%0.12%0.00%9.47%0.00%0.26%1.00%0.38%1.27%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
1.65%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DCEMX and PDEZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PDEZX has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to DCEMX (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCEMX dropped -70.65% vs PDEZX's -54.95%.

DCEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCEMX and PDEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer