DCEMX vs. EMPTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DCEMX (Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund) and EMPTX (UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, DCEMX returned 5.49%/yr vs 6.59%/yr for EMPTX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DCEMX charges 2.03%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EMPTX.

Performance

DCEMX vs. EMPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCEMX achieves a 34.94% return, which is significantly higher than EMPTX's 30.51% return.

DCEMX

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 10.12%
• YTD: 34.94%
• 6M: 39.47%
• 1Y: 62.98%
• 3Y*: 23.50%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

EMPTX

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 10.37%
• YTD: 30.51%
• 6M: 34.39%
• 1Y: 68.31%
• 3Y*: 26.97%
• 5Y*: 6.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCEMX vs. EMPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DCEMX Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund	34.94%	28.90%	4.84%	6.16%	-25.20%	-7.30%	23.89%	21.88%	-19.91%
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	30.51%	43.82%	2.51%	8.92%	-25.38%	-9.36%	24.79%	14.98%	0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DCEMX and EMPTX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018	0.76

The correlation between DCEMX and EMPTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DCEMX vs. EMPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCEMX

DCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 85
DCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

EMPTX

EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 94
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCEMX vs. EMPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DCEMX	EMPTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	4.00	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	4.80	-1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.71	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	5.17	-0.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.18	20.43	-3.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DCEMX vs. EMPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the EMPTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCEMX and EMPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DCEMX	EMPTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02	4.00	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.35	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.49	-0.25

Drawdowns

DCEMX vs. EMPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCEMX drawdown since its inception was -70.65%, which is greater than EMPTX's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCEMX and EMPTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCEMX	EMPTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.65%	-46.03%	-24.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-14.50%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.83%	-15.50%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.04%	-41.46%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-18.37%	-7.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	3.54%	+0.14%

Volatility

DCEMX vs. EMPTX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) has a higher volatility of 8.98% compared to UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) at 7.75%. This indicates that DCEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCEMX	EMPTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.98%	7.75%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.94%	16.12%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.94%	18.72%	+2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.17%	19.28%	-1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	19.37%	-1.09%

DCEMX vs. EMPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCEMX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EMPTX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

DCEMX vs. EMPTX - Dividend Comparison

DCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than EMPTX's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DCEMX Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund	1.60%	2.17%	0.00%	0.12%	0.00%	9.47%	0.00%	0.26%	1.00%	0.38%	1.27%
EMPTX UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund	1.47%	1.91%	3.40%	3.20%	3.84%	11.93%	1.50%	2.75%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DCEMX and EMPTX in my portfolio?

DCEMX and EMPTX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DCEMX or EMPTX?

DCEMX has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to EMPTX (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCEMX dropped -70.65% vs EMPTX's -46.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.