PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCEMX vs. DCCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCEMX vs. DCCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund (DCCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCEMX achieves a 33.14% return, which is significantly higher than DCCGX's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, DCEMX has outperformed DCCGX with an annualized return of 8.32%, while DCCGX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.02% annualized return.


DCEMX

1D
2.47%
1M
9.86%
YTD
33.14%
6M
37.52%
1Y
60.81%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
8.32%

DCCGX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.15%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*
1.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCEMX vs. DCCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
33.14%28.90%4.84%6.16%-25.20%-7.30%23.89%21.88%-20.99%32.42%
DCCGX
Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund
0.03%5.63%1.51%5.22%-13.02%-1.46%6.53%8.93%-3.26%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DCEMX and DCCGX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2004

-0.05

The correlation between DCEMX and DCCGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCEMX vs. DCCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCEMX
DCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DCCGX
DCCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DCCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DCCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCEMX vs. DCCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund (DCCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCEMXDCCGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.99

1.27

+1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

1.88

+1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.23

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

1.68

+2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.34

5.02

+11.32

DCEMX vs. DCCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the DCCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCEMX and DCCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCEMXDCCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

1.27

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.06

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.25

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.46

-0.23

Drawdowns

DCEMX vs. DCCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCEMX drawdown since its inception was -70.65%, which is greater than DCCGX's maximum drawdown of -17.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCEMX and DCCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCEMXDCCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.65%

-17.54%

-53.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.89%

-2.61%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-5.93%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.04%

-17.35%

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.88%

-17.54%

-28.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.27%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-3.33%

-22.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

0.87%

+2.81%

Volatility

DCEMX vs. DCCGX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund (DCCGX) at 1.34%. This indicates that DCEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCEMXDCCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.96%

1.34%

+7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

2.52%

+15.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

3.44%

+17.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

4.89%

+13.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

4.13%

+14.15%

DCEMX vs. DCCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCEMX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DCCGX's 2.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCEMX vs. DCCGX - Dividend Comparison

DCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than DCCGX's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCCGX
Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund
3.54%3.60%3.22%2.93%1.21%0.68%1.15%1.88%2.13%1.54%1.72%2.61%
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
1.63%2.17%0.00%0.12%0.00%9.47%0.00%0.26%1.00%0.38%1.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCEMX and DCCGX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCEMX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to DCCGX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCEMX dropped -70.65% vs DCCGX's -17.54%.

DCEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCEMX and DCCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer