DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE
DCAM.PA (Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCAM.PA is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DCAM.PA returned 22.19% vs 95.12% for LSMC.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DCAM.PA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCAM.PA achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 58.81% return.
DCAM.PA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.21%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- 6M
- 49.10%
- YTD
- 58.81%
- 1Y
- 95.12%
- 3Y*
- 58.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.76%
DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DCAM.PA Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc | 12.14% | 8.42% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 58.81% | 44.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCAM.PA and LSMC.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DCAM.PA and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DCAM.PA
LSMC.DE
DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc (DCAM.PA) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DCAM.PA | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 6.09 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 19.29 | -5.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCAM.PA drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCAM.PA and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCAM.PA | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.90% | -39.64% | +22.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.54% | -15.54% | +9.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -10.70% | +9.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -11.33% | +9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 4.91% | -3.26% |
Volatility
DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi PEA Monde (MSCI World) UCITS ETF Acc (DCAM.PA) is 2.72%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that DCAM.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCAM.PA | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 14.45% | -11.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 26.62% | -18.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 34.01% | -23.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 32.76% | -17.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 32.76% | -17.81% |
DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCAM.PA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCAM.PA vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DCAM.PA nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DCAM.PA and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DCAM.PA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DCAM.PA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
DCAM.PA is categorized as Global Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. DCAM.PA tracks MSCI World Index, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DCAM.PA and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for DCAM.PA and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer