DCAIX vs. JNJ
DCAIX (Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund) is Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Dunham Funds, while JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, DCAIX returned 3.71%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DCAIX vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCAIX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DCAIX has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 3.71%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
DCAIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 3.71%
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 48.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
DCAIX vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCAIX Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund | 1.25% | 2.47% | 3.78% | 0.60% | -2.64% | 1.47% | 4.11% | 5.81% | 4.17% | 10.40% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 9.07% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCAIX and JNJ is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2004 | 0.32 |
The correlation between DCAIX and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCAIX vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
DCAIX
JNJ
DCAIX vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund (DCAIX) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCAIX | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.99 | 1.52 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.55 | 4.42 | +3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.57 | 13.33 | +10.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCAIX | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.91 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.55 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.54 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
DCAIX vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCAIX drawdown since its inception was -46.34%, smaller than the maximum JNJ drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCAIX and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCAIX | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.34% | -50.67% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.37% | -10.96% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.85% | -15.95% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.45% | -18.41% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.53% | -27.37% | +20.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -9.67% | +9.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -11.88% | +5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.12% | 3.63% | -3.51% |
Volatility
DCAIX vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund (DCAIX) is 0.33%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that DCAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCAIX | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 5.20% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.70% | 12.17% | -11.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01% | 16.67% | -15.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 16.82% | -15.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.97% | 18.45% | -14.48% |
Dividends
DCAIX vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
DCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than JNJ's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCAIX Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund | 3.64% | 3.79% | 3.72% | 4.04% | 2.63% | 2.25% | 2.39% | 2.27% | 1.31% | 1.33% | 2.28% | 5.72% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.35% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCAIX and JNJ have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JNJ has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to DCAIX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCAIX dropped -46.34% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCAIX and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer