DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE
DBZB.DE (Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBZB.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged), while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBZB.DE returned -2.54%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. DBZB.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBZB.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
DBZB.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 0.76%
- 5Y*
- -2.54%
- 10Y*
- -0.99%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 31.13%
- 1Y
- 51.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBZB.DE Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged | -0.71% | 1.28% | -0.41% | 3.56% | -15.11% | -3.19% | 4.16% | 4.55% | -0.36% | -0.92% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBZB.DE and XMME.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | -0.05 |
The correlation between DBZB.DE and XMME.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBZB.DE
XMME.DE
DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBZB.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.55 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 4.98 | -4.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 18.04 | -18.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBZB.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 3.00 | -3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | 0.51 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.45 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBZB.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, smaller than the maximum XMME.DE drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBZB.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBZB.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -31.96% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -10.67% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.14% | -19.16% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | -24.38% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.44% | -1.04% | -15.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -9.53% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 2.95% | -1.69% |
Volatility
DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) is 1.48%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that DBZB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBZB.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 7.48% | -6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 14.90% | -11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 17.70% | -13.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 16.74% | -11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 18.61% | -13.87% |
DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBZB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DBZB.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBZB.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBZB.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DBZB.DE.
DBZB.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. DBZB.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged), while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DBZB.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBZB.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer