PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBZB.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.DE's 25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, DBZB.DE has underperformed XDWT.DE with an annualized return of -0.99%, while XDWT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.00% annualized return.


DBZB.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
-0.05%
3Y*
0.76%
5Y*
-2.54%
10Y*
-0.99%

XDWT.DE

1D
-2.03%
1M
14.75%
YTD
25.23%
6M
23.98%
1Y
48.86%
3Y*
29.29%
5Y*
22.52%
10Y*
24.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBZB.DE
Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
-0.71%1.28%-0.41%3.56%-15.11%-3.19%4.16%4.55%-0.36%-0.12%
XDWT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
25.23%9.56%41.11%50.00%-28.10%41.76%30.98%51.77%0.78%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DBZB.DE and XDWT.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

-0.05

The correlation between DBZB.DE and XDWT.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (10 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBZB.DE
DBZB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DBZB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBZB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBZB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DBZB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBZB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWT.DE
XDWT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBZB.DEXDWT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.38

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

3.12

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.04

8.24

-8.28

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBZB.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBZB.DE and XDWT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBZB.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

2.38

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

0.99

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

1.11

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

1.09

-0.87

Drawdowns

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBZB.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, smaller than the maximum XDWT.DE drawdown of -31.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBZB.DE and XDWT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBZB.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-31.61%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-15.59%

+12.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.14%

-29.46%

+24.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

-29.46%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.88%

-31.61%

+9.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.44%

-2.61%

-13.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-5.82%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

5.91%

-4.65%

Volatility

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) is 1.48%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that DBZB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBZB.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

7.11%

-5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

14.96%

-11.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

20.39%

-16.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.37%

22.55%

-17.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

21.46%

-16.72%

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DBZB.DE and XDWT.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBZB.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBZB.DE nor XDWT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DBZB.DE and XDWT.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBZB.DE and XDWT.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

DBZB.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while XDWT.DE is Technology Equities. DBZB.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged), while XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBZB.DE and XDWT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer