PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBXT.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXT.DE achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 19.10% return.


DBXT.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.19%
6M
0.99%
YTD
1.02%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
0.73%

XNAS.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.01%
6M
20.42%
YTD
19.10%
1Y
33.14%
3Y*
23.27%
5Y*
16.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DBXT.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.02%2.22%3.80%3.29%-0.04%-0.43%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
19.10%7.11%33.75%51.36%-29.99%31.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXT.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXT.DE
DBXT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DBXT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBXT.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBXT.DEXNAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+22.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.49

1.35

+4.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

73.33

3.33

+70.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

349.66

9.64

+340.02

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 10.37, which is higher than the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXT.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXT.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.63%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXT.DE and XNAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXT.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-31.25%

+26.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-10.00%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

-26.72%

+26.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.59%

-31.25%

+29.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.56%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-7.75%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

3.45%

-3.44%

Volatility

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBXT.DE) is 0.06%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that DBXT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXT.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

6.66%

-6.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

12.34%

-12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19%

16.97%

-16.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.87%

20.06%

-19.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.13%

19.92%

-18.79%

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXT.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXT.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBXT.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXT.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBXT.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXT.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

DBXT.DE is categorized as Money Market, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. DBXT.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for DBXT.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXT.DE and XNAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer