DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE
DBXS.DE (Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist)) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBXS.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBXS.DE returned 8.88%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for XNAS.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBXS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.
Performance
DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXS.DE achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 19.10% return.
DBXS.DE
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- YTD
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 33.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.39%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 11.71% | 19.12% | 3.77% | 10.63% | -11.87% | 24.94% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.10% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 31.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXS.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DBXS.DE and XNAS.DE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXS.DE
XNAS.DE
DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBXS.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.33 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 9.64 | -2.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXS.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.29%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXS.DE and XNAS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXS.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.29% | -31.25% | -17.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -10.00% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -26.72% | +12.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -31.25% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.56% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -7.75% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.45% | +0.06% |
Volatility
DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) is 3.96%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that DBXS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXS.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 6.66% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 12.34% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.80% | 16.97% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 20.06% | -6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 19.92% | -5.93% |
DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBXS.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBXS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 3.25% | 1.20% | 1.59% | 1.21% | 2.35% | 1.32% | 1.06% | 1.25% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXS.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXS.DE.
DBXS.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. DBXS.DE tracks Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DBXS.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXS.DE and XNAS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer