PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXQ.DE achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than XDEW.DE's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXQ.DE has underperformed XDEW.DE with an annualized return of 0.15%, while XDEW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.04% annualized return.


DBXQ.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.53%
6M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.14%
1Y
0.29%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-0.34%
10Y*
0.15%

XDEW.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.32%
6M
9.75%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBXQ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF
-0.14%2.57%2.23%5.50%-10.12%-1.37%1.56%2.56%-0.06%-0.19%
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
14.50%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-6.94%41.59%1.18%31.27%-4.53%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXQ.DE and XDEW.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.08

The correlation between DBXQ.DE and XDEW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (10 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXQ.DE
DBXQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DBXQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBXQ.DEXDEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.35

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

3.91

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

12.05

-11.74

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXQ.DE and XDEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.25%, smaller than the maximum XDEW.DE drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXQ.DE and XDEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXQ.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-38.79%

+26.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-5.06%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-22.70%

+20.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.13%

-22.70%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.25%

-38.79%

+26.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.61%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-5.33%

+3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.65%

-0.72%

Volatility

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) is 0.65%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that DBXQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXQ.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

2.81%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

6.82%

-4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

10.43%

-7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.71%

14.90%

-11.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.31%

16.80%

-13.49%

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXQ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXQ.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBXQ.DE nor XDEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXQ.DE and XDEW.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBXQ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

DBXQ.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XDEW.DE is S&P 500. DBXQ.DE tracks Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 3-5, while XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for DBXQ.DE and 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXQ.DE and XDEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer