PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXP.DE achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.


DBXP.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.12%
1Y
0.80%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
0.22%

XNAS.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
9.23%
YTD
20.53%
6M
19.39%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DBXP.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.04%2.21%2.99%3.41%-4.59%-0.70%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
20.53%7.11%33.75%51.36%-29.99%33.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXP.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXP.DE
DBXP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DBXP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBXP.DEXNAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.42

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.77

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

11.16

-9.09

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXP.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBXP.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

2.40

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.93

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.91

-0.35

Drawdowns

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXP.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXP.DE and XNAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXP.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-31.25%

+24.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-10.00%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-26.72%

+25.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.67%

-31.25%

+25.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.83%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-7.83%

+6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

3.38%

-2.99%

Volatility

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) is 0.46%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that DBXP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXP.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

4.31%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.11%

10.91%

-9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22%

15.71%

-14.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.65%

19.88%

-18.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.80%

19.84%

-18.04%

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXP.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXP.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBXP.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXP.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBXP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

DBXP.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. DBXP.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 1-3, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for DBXP.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXP.DE and XNAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer